feat(genai): add support to built-in url_context tool
#1371
+26
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wilyJ80
changed the title
url_context toolurl_context tool
Contributor
Author
|
no tests for the other tool integrations, so i didn't add either, since it would be confusing. it's just extra integration with the Google API client for it, i suppose. |
Collaborator
|
@wilyJ80 thanks for your contribution! Could you add an integration test though, please. We should slowly extend the coverage. |
Contributor
Author
|
@lkuligin done! good call. sorry for the long wait. let me know if there's anything else needed to merge! i know some people who could really use this feature in the next release 🤣 |
lkuligin
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This adds the built-in Google GenAI
url_contexttool for searching URLs. Working fine!Relevant issues
No issues, but mentioned in the forum: Langchain Forum
Type
🆕 New Feature
Changes(optional)
Testing(optional)
Note(optional)